In re Jorden R.

951 A.2d 569, 287 Conn. 921, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 264
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 10, 2008·No. SC 18169·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The petition by the commissioner of children and families for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn. App. 12 (AC 28128), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court improperly interpret General Statutes § 17a-112 to require the department of children and families to prove it made reasonable efforts to reunify a family before a court can find a parent is unable or unwilling to benefit from services?

“2. Did the Appellate Court improperly substitute its judgment for the trial court’s in overruling the trial court’s finding that the respondent mother was unable or unwilling to benefit from reunification services?

“3. Did the Appellate Court err in overruling the trial court’s decision to exclude a psychological evaluation of the respondent mother?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Jorden R., 951 A.2d 569, 287 Conn. 921, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 264 (Colo. 2008).

951 A.2d 569 (In re Jorden R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Jorden R.
979 A.2d 469 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2009)
In Re Jorden
951 A.2d 569 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)