In re Jorden R.
This text of 951 A.2d 569 (In re Jorden R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition by the commissioner of children and families for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn. App. 12 (AC 28128), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court improperly interpret General Statutes § 17a-112 to require the department of children and families to prove it made reasonable efforts to reunify a family before a court can find a parent is unable or unwilling to benefit from services?
“2. Did the Appellate Court improperly substitute its judgment for the trial court’s in overruling the trial court’s finding that the respondent mother was unable or unwilling to benefit from reunification services?
“3. Did the Appellate Court err in overruling the trial court’s decision to exclude a psychological evaluation of the respondent mother?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
951 A.2d 569, 287 Conn. 921, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jorden-r-conn-2008.