In Re Jorden

951 A.2d 569, 287 Conn. 921
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 10, 2008
Docket18169
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 951 A.2d 569 (In Re Jorden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Jorden, 951 A.2d 569, 287 Conn. 921 (Colo. 2008).

Opinion

951 A.2d 569 (2008)
287 Conn. 921

In re JORDEN R.

No. 18169.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided June 10, 2008.

Susan T. Pearlman, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition.

Michael J. Melly, in opposition.

The petition by the commissioner of children and families for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn. App. 12, 944 A.2d 402 (2008), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court improperly interpret General Statutes § 17a-112 to require the department of children and families to prove it made reasonable efforts to reunify a family before a court can find a parent is unable or unwilling to benefit from services?

"2. Did the Appellate Court improperly substitute its judgment for the trial court's in overruling the trial court's finding that the respondent mother was unable or unwilling to benefit from reunification services?

"3. Did the Appellate Court err in overruling the trial court's decision to exclude a psychological evaluation of the respondent mother?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18169.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peruccio v. Commissioner of Correction
951 A.2d 569 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
951 A.2d 569, 287 Conn. 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jorden-conn-2008.