In Re Johnson

228 A.2d 343, 49 N.J. 110, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 209
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 27, 1967·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*111 The opinion of the court was delivered

Per' Curiam.

The respondent was heretofore suspended for one year upon charges involving the diversion to his own use of moneys entrusted to him. In re Johnson, 36 N. J. 535 (1962). After his reinstatement respondent again converted trust funds. He does not question his guilt. In fact he offered to resign with prejudice under R. R. 1:18A. Although such a resignation is “equivalent to disbarment,” as the cited rule expressly provides, we rejected the resignation as inappropriate in these circumstances. Respondent should be and he is disbarred.

For disbarment —■ Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall, Scilettino and Hake-man — 7.

Opposed — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Johnson, 228 A.2d 343, 49 N.J. 110, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 209 (N.J. 1967).

228 A.2d 343 (In Re Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Gasaway
1993 OK 133 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1993)
In Re Miller
482 P.2d 326 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1971)