In re Johnson

149 So. 3d 1233, 2014 La. LEXIS 2407, 2014 WL 5509515
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 24, 2014·No. No. 2014-B-1942·Published

Opinions

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

liThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent engaged in conduct constituting a conflict of interest. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Laura J. Johnson, Louisiana Bar Roll number 7312, be and she hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

KNOLL, J., would reject the consent discipline.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Johnson, 149 So. 3d 1233, 2014 La. LEXIS 2407, 2014 WL 5509515 (La. 2014).

149 So. 3d 1233 (In re Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.