In re Johnson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Johnson

193 So. 3d 124, 2016 WL 3129123, 2016 La. LEXIS 1295

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 27, 2016

DocketNo. 2016-B-0661

StatusPublished

This text of 193 So. 3d 124 (In re Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Johnson, 193 So. 3d 124, 2016 WL 3129123, 2016 La. LEXIS 1295 (La. 2016).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

|,In September 2015, respondent pleaded guilty to making and subscribing a false income tax return. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Richard Z. Johnson, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 18966, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years, retroactive to December 4, 2015, the date of his interim suspension.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, [125]*125with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

KNOLL, J., dissents and assigns reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

|,In September 2015, respondent pleaded guilty to making and subscribing a false income tax return. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Richard Z. Johnson, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 18966, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years, retroactive to December 4, 2015, the date of his interim suspension.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, [125]*125with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

KNOLL, J., dissents and assigns reasons.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 So. 3d 124, 2016 WL 3129123, 2016 La. LEXIS 1295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-johnson-la-2016.