In re Johnson

California Court of Appeal

In re Johnson

30 Cal. App. 792

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 Cal. App. 319 →

California Court of Appeal·Decided March 7, 1916·No. Crim. No. 473·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

The application of petitioner to be released from custody by the chief of police of the city of Los Angeles upon the ground that judgment of imprisonment was pronounced by the police court after 12 o’clock noon on Saturday is denied, for the reason that we find the preponderance of the evidence contained in affidavits filed touching the question shows that sentence was pronounced before noon on said day. It is therefore ordered that petitioner be remanded to custody.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The application of petitioner to be released from custody by the chief of police of the city of Los Angeles upon the ground that judgment of imprisonment was pronounced by the police court after 12 o’clock noon on Saturday is denied, for the reason that we find the preponderance of the evidence contained in affidavits filed touching the question shows that sentence was pronounced before noon on said day. It is therefore ordered that petitioner be remanded to custody.

In re Johnson, 30 Cal. App. 792 (Cal. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

30 Cal. App. 792 (In re Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.