in Re John Austin Basham, Darlia Lee Hobbs, and Texans for Government Transparency

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 27, 2014·No. 02-14-00053-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00053-CV

IN RE JOHN AUSTIN BASHAM, DARLIA RELATORS LEE HOBBS, AND TEXANS FOR GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of injunction and motion

for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.2

Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of injuntion and motion for emergency relief

are denied.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d). 2 We cannot take affirmative acts beyond that necessary for enforcement of this court’s jurisdiction. See In re Williams, No. 02-13-00087-CV, 2013 WL 1437253, at *2–3 (Tex. App.–Fort Worth Apr. 8, 2013, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and MEIER, J.

DELIVERED: February 27, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re John Austin Basham, Darlia Lee Hobbs, and Texans for Government Transparency, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

in Re John Austin Basham, Darlia Lee Hobbs, and Texans for Government Transparency (in Re John Austin Basham, Darlia Lee Hobbs, and Texans for Government Transparency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.