in Re John Austin Basham, Darlia Lee Hobbs, and Texans for Government Transparency
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-14-00053-CV
IN RE JOHN AUSTIN BASHAM, DARLIA RELATORS LEE HOBBS, AND TEXANS FOR GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
CORRECTED MEMORANDUM OPINION1
The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of injunction and motion
for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.2
Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of injunction and motion for emergency
relief are denied.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d). 2 We cannot take affirmative acts beyond that necessary for enforcement of this court’s jurisdiction. See In re Williams, No. 02-13-00087-CV, 2013 WL 1437253, at *2–3 (Tex. App.–Fort Worth Apr. 8, 2013, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and MEIER, J.
DELIVERED: February 27, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re John Austin Basham, Darlia Lee Hobbs, and Texans for Government Transparency (in Re John Austin Basham, Darlia Lee Hobbs, and Texans for Government Transparency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.