in Re John Austin Basham, Darlia Lee Hobbs, and Texans for Government Transparency
This text of in Re John Austin Basham, Darlia Lee Hobbs, and Texans for Government Transparency (in Re John Austin Basham, Darlia Lee Hobbs, and Texans for Government Transparency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-14-00053-CV
IN RE JOHN AUSTIN BASHAM, DARLIA RELATORS LEE HOBBS, AND TEXANS FOR GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of injunction and motion
for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.2
Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of injuntion and motion for emergency relief
are denied.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d). 2 We cannot take affirmative acts beyond that necessary for enforcement of this court’s jurisdiction. See In re Williams, No. 02-13-00087-CV, 2013 WL 1437253, at *2–3 (Tex. App.–Fort Worth Apr. 8, 2013, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and MEIER, J.
DELIVERED: February 27, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re John Austin Basham, Darlia Lee Hobbs, and Texans for Government Transparency, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-austin-basham-darlia-lee-hobbs-and-texa-texapp-2014.