In re John AA.

75 A.D.2d 910, 427 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11563
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 1, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 75 A.D.2d 910 (In re John AA.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re John AA., 75 A.D.2d 910, 427 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11563 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Family Court of Ulster County, entered April 5, 1979, which adjudged appellants’ three children to be permanently neglected pursuant to article 6 of the Family Court Act. The sole contention upon this appeal is that section 622 of the Family Court Act is unconstitutional because the standard of proof required by the statute, a fair preponderance of the evidence, is so low that it deprives them of due process of law. In Matter of Anthony L. CC. (48 AD2d 415, 419), this court held that the level of proof required by section 622 was constitutional. In adhering to our decision, we note that the permanent neglect statute (Social Services Law, § 384-b; Family Ct Act, § 611 et seq.) recognizes and seeks to balance rights possessed by the child (see Social Services Law, § 384-b, subd 1; Matter of Bennett v Jeffreys, 40 NY2d 543, 546-547) with those of the natural parents (see Social Services Law, § 384-b, subd 1; Matter of Sanjivini K, 47 NY2d 374, 382; Matter of Corey L v Martin L, 45 NY2d 383, 392). Accordingly, application of the preponderance of evidence standard in such a proceeding involving these often conflicting rights is proper and constitutional. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Monro
Washington Supreme Court, 2026
in the Interest of K.I.B.C., a Child
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
in the Interest of A.G. and F.G., Children
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
in the Interest of S. R.- M. C.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Kingsley v. Kingsley
623 So. 2d 780 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Kramer v. John AA
89 A.D.2d 738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Farrell
648 P.2d 401 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1982)
In Re the Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action No. J-3824
637 P.2d 740 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1981)
In re K. J. L.
434 A.2d 1004 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1981)
Matter of KJL
434 A.2d 1004 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1981)
In re Pablo C.
108 Misc. 2d 842 (NYC Family Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 A.D.2d 910, 427 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-john-aa-nyappdiv-1980.