in Re: Jimmy Dewayne Hill

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 5, 2013·No. 05-13-00849-CV·Published

Opinion

Dismiss Writ and Opinion Filed July 5, 2013

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00849-CV

IN RE JIMMY DEWAYNE HILL, Relator

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09-53582W

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Francis Before the Court is relator=s petition for writ of mandamus naming his attorney as

respondent. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them

herein. This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over relator’s attorney. See TEX. GOV=T

CODE ANN. ' 22.221 (West 2010). Accordingly, we DISMISS relator=s petition for a writ of

mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

/Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS 130849F.P05 JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Jimmy Dewayne Hill, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re: Jimmy Dewayne Hill (in Re: Jimmy Dewayne Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.