in Re: Jimmy Dewayne Hill
This text of in Re: Jimmy Dewayne Hill (in Re: Jimmy Dewayne Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismiss Writ and Opinion Filed July 5, 2013
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-00849-CV
IN RE JIMMY DEWAYNE HILL, Relator
On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09-53582W
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Francis Before the Court is relator=s petition for writ of mandamus naming his attorney as
respondent. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them
herein. This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over relator’s attorney. See TEX. GOV=T
CODE ANN. ' 22.221 (West 2010). Accordingly, we DISMISS relator=s petition for a writ of
mandamus for want of jurisdiction.
/Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS 130849F.P05 JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Jimmy Dewayne Hill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jimmy-dewayne-hill-texapp-2013.