in Re: Jimmy Dewayne Hill

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 5, 2013
Docket05-13-00849-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Jimmy Dewayne Hill (in Re: Jimmy Dewayne Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Jimmy Dewayne Hill, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Dismiss Writ and Opinion Filed July 5, 2013

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00849-CV

IN RE JIMMY DEWAYNE HILL, Relator

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09-53582W

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Francis Before the Court is relator=s petition for writ of mandamus naming his attorney as

respondent. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them

herein. This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over relator’s attorney. See TEX. GOV=T

CODE ANN. ' 22.221 (West 2010). Accordingly, we DISMISS relator=s petition for a writ of

mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

/Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS 130849F.P05 JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Jimmy Dewayne Hill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jimmy-dewayne-hill-texapp-2013.