In Re Jeremy Vance Wickman v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Court of Appeals Tenth Appellate District of Texas
10-25-00289-CR 10-25-00290-CR 10-25-00291-CR 10-25-00292-CR
In re Jeremy Vance Wickman
Original Proceeding
CHIEF JUSTICE JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Crystal Wickman filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus on
behalf of Jeremy Vance Wickman, who is currently incarcerated in Navarro
County in four cause numbers. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.13. The
applications were filed as original proceedings in this Court contending that
Jeremy Vance Wickman is being illegally confined and unlawfully restrained
in Navarro County, Texas.
Original jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal
proceeding is limited to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district
courts, and the county courts. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.05. In the application, Crystal Wickman does not allege that she or Jeremy Wickman
have filed petitions for a writ of habeas corpus in the trial court from which
they are attempting to appeal. Because she is seeking direct relief from this
Court, we lack jurisdiction in this proceeding. See Ex parte Twyman, 716
S.W.2d 951, 952 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986).
The petitions for writ of habeas corpus filed by Crystal Wickman on
behalf of Jeremy Vance Wickman on August 26, 2025, are dismissed for want
of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
MATT JOHNSON Chief Justice
OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: August 28, 2025 Before Chief Justice Johnson, Justice Smith, and Justice Harris Dismissed Do not publish OT06
In re Jeremy Vance Wickman Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Jeremy Vance Wickman v. the State of Texas (In Re Jeremy Vance Wickman v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.