In Re Jeremy Vance Wickman v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Jeremy Vance Wickman v. the State of Texas (In Re Jeremy Vance Wickman v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals Tenth Appellate District of Texas
10-25-00269-CR
In re Jeremy Vance Wickman
Original Proceeding
CHIEF JUSTICE JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jeremy Vance Wickman filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus
as an original proceeding in this Court contending that he was being illegally
confined and unlawfully restrained. Original jurisdiction to issue a writ
of habeas corpus in a criminal proceeding is limited to the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals, the district courts, and the county courts. See TEX. CODE
CRIM. PROC. art. 11.05. In his application, Wickman does not allege that he has
filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the trial court and is attempting
to appeal the trial court’s ruling. Because he is seeking direct relief from this
Court, we lack jurisdiction in this proceeding. See Ex parte Twyman, 716
S.W.2d 951, 952 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986). The petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by Jeremy Vance Wickman
on August 15, 2025, is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a).
MATT JOHNSON Chief Justice
OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: August 18, 2025 Before Chief Justice Johnson, Justice Smith, and Justice Harris Dismissed Do not publish OT06
In re Jeremy Vance Wickman Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Jeremy Vance Wickman v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jeremy-vance-wickman-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.