In re J.E. & Q.D.

655 S.E.2d 831, 362 N.C. 168, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 23
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 25, 2008·No. No. 297A07·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and that court is instructed to reinstate the order of the trial court terminating respondent’s parental rights.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re J.E. & Q.D., 655 S.E.2d 831, 362 N.C. 168, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 23 (N.C. 2008).

655 S.E.2d 831 (In re J.E. & Q.D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re: P.U.M.C., N.M.P., T.M.P., Jr.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2025
In Re Dwc, Jac
698 S.E.2d 79 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
In re D.W.C.
698 S.E.2d 79 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
In Re Abk
659 S.E.2d 491 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)