In Re Jay Furman v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Jay Furman v. the State of Texas (In Re Jay Furman v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00837-CV
IN RE Jay FURMAN
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 12, 2025
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED
On December 5, 2024, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On December 19,
2024, this court issued an order granting relator a writ of mandamus. On December 31, 2024, this
court issued an opinion explaining the granting of the writ.
Acting sua sponte, we withdraw the previously issued order and opinion and substitute
this opinion in their stead.
Relator has failed to establish that he has personally served respondent. Accordingly, he
has not demonstrated that this court has personal jurisdiction over respondent to grant the relief
relator seeks, and we DISMISS this original proceeding.
1 This proceeding arises out of a dispute between relator and the Recount Chair for Webb County, Texas, regarding the copying of challenged ballots under Texas Election Code section 213.013(i).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Jay Furman v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jay-furman-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.