In Re Jay Furman v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Jay Furman v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 12, 2025·No. 04-24-00837-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-24-00837-CV

IN RE Jay FURMAN

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 12, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED On December 5, 2024, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On December 19, 2024, this court issued an order granting relator a writ of mandamus. On December 31, 2024, this court issued an opinion explaining the granting of the writ.

Acting sua sponte, we withdraw the previously issued order and opinion and substitute this opinion in their stead.

Relator has failed to establish that he has personally served respondent. Accordingly, he has not demonstrated that this court has personal jurisdiction over respondent to grant the relief relator seeks, and we DISMISS this original proceeding.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of a dispute between relator and the Recount Chair for Webb County, Texas, regarding the copying of challenged ballots under Texas Election Code section 213.013(i).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-24-00837-CV

IN RE Jay FURMAN

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 12, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED On December 5, 2024, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On December 19, 2024, this court issued an order granting relator a writ of mandamus. On December 31, 2024, this court issued an opinion explaining the granting of the writ.

Acting sua sponte, we withdraw the previously issued order and opinion and substitute this opinion in their stead.

Relator has failed to establish that he has personally served respondent. Accordingly, he has not demonstrated that this court has personal jurisdiction over respondent to grant the relief relator seeks, and we DISMISS this original proceeding.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of a dispute between relator and the Recount Chair for Webb County, Texas, regarding the copying of challenged ballots under Texas Election Code section 213.013(i).

In Re Jay Furman v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

In Re Jay Furman v. the State of Texas (In Re Jay Furman v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.