In Re Jay Furman v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 31, 2024
Docket04-24-00837-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Jay Furman v. the State of Texas (In Re Jay Furman v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Jay Furman v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00837-CV

IN RE Jay FURMAN

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 31, 2024

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS GRANTED

On December 6, 2024, relator filed an emergency petition for writ of mandamus,

asserting Salvador Tellez, the Recount Chair for Webb County, is violating relator’s right under

section 213.013(i) of the Texas Election Code to photocopy ballots cast in the November 2024

election Texas. On December 18, 2024, relator filed a supplement to his petition. On December

9, 2024, this court requested responses from respondent and any other interested party. No

responses were filed.

1 This proceeding arises out of a dispute between relator and Salvador Tellez, the Recount Chair for Webb County, Texas, regarding the copying of challenged ballots under Texas Election Code section 213.013(i). See TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. § 273.061(a) (“[A] court of appeals may issue a writ of mandamus to compel the performance of any duty imposed by law in connection with the holding of an election or a political party convention, regardless of whether the person responsible for performing the duty is a public officer.”). 04-24-00837-CV

Section 213.013(i) states, in part, that:

[A] person entitled to appoint watchers to serve at the recount, the recount committee chair shall permit the person to photocopy under the chair's supervision any ballot, including any supporting materials, challenged by the person or person's watcher.

TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. § 213.013(i). As a candidate for congressional office, relator qualifies as

“a person entitled to appoint watchers to serve at the recount,” and therefore has statutory rights

under section 213.013(i). 2 It is undisputed that relator challenged all of the ballots filed in Webb

County for the November 2024 election via a “blanket challenge,” and we have found no

authority holding a blanket challenge is ineffective to trigger a person’s rights under section

213.013(i) to photocopy all such challenged ballots. It is also undisputed that Mr. Tellez is not

allowing relator to photocopy the ballots relator challenged.

Accordingly, we conclude section 213.013(i) of the Texas Election Code has been

violated. Therefore, we GRANT the writ of mandamus and ORDER Mr. Tellez to immediately

permit relator and relator’s watchers to photocopy under the chair’s supervision all ballots,

including any supporting materials, blanket challenged by relator. See TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. §

213.013.

2 See TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. § 213.013(b) (“In a recount of an election on an office, each candidate for the office is entitled to be present at the recount and have watchers present in the number corresponding to the number of counting teams designated for the recount. If only one counting team is designated or the recount is conducted on automatic tabulating equipment, each candidate is entitled to two watchers.”) (emphasis added).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 213.013
Texas EL § 213.013(i)
§ 273.061
Texas EL § 273.061(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Jay Furman v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jay-furman-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.