In Re Jason Neil Kosier v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 6, 2024
Docket03-24-00560-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Jason Neil Kosier v. the State of Texas (In Re Jason Neil Kosier v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Jason Neil Kosier v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00560-CV

In re Jason Neil Kosier

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury convicted relator Jason Neil Kosier of the misdemeanor offense of deadly

conduct, and on July 24, 2024, the district court sentenced him to 100 days’ confinement in the

Bell County Jail. See Tex. Penal Code 22.05(a), (e). Kosier filed a notice of appeal from his

conviction, which this Court docketed under appellate cause number 03-24-00331-CR and is

currently pending.

On August 22, 2024, Kosier filed in the trial court a petition for writ of habeas

corpus and motion for emergency relief, asserting that he is being illegally detained for the

convicted offense and demanding that the trial court schedule an emergency hearing before

August 31, 2024, which he asserts is his “projected release date,” and order his immediate

release from jail. 1 Less than one week later, Kosier filed the same documents in this Court,

complaining of the trial court’s failure to timely “answer” his petition and demanding that this

Court order Kosier’s immediate release from jail and dismiss the case against him.

1 We do not know if Kosier was released from jail on August 31, 2024, or remains confined. Kosier is requesting habeas-corpus relief. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.01

(“The writ of habeas corpus is the remedy to be used when any person is restrained in his

liberty.”). However, “[t]he courts of appeals have no original habeas-corpus jurisdiction in

criminal matters.” In re Ayers, 515 S.W.3d 356, 356 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016,

orig. proceeding). “Our habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters is appellate only.”

In re Hall, No. 03-17-00778-CV, 2017 WL 5985541, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 30, 2017,

orig. proceeding) (citing Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221). Accordingly, we dismiss for want of

jurisdiction the petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for emergency relief. See id.

__________________________________________ Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Theofanis

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: September 6, 2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

in Re Avery Lamarr Ayers
515 S.W.3d 356 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Jason Neil Kosier v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jason-neil-kosier-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.