In re Jane Doe 13-A

136 So. 3d 748, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5459, 2014 WL 1408053
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 2014·No. No. 1D13-5458·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ORDER ON MOTION FOR HEARING EN BANC

A judge of this court requested that this cause be considered en banc in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.331(c). All judges in regular active service have voted on the request. Less than a majority of those judges voted in favor of [749]*749hearing en banc. Accordingly, the request for hearing en banc is denied.

LEWIS, C.J., WOLF, BENTON, VAN NORTWICK, PADOVANO, ROBERTS, CLARK, WETHERELL, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur. PADOVANO, J., concurs in an opinion in which VAN NORTWICK and CLARK, JJ., join. THOMAS, ROWE, RAY, SWANSON, MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., dissent. THOMAS, J., dissents in an opinion in which RAY, SWANSON, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., join. ROWE, J., dissents in an opinion in which THOMAS, RAY, SWANSON, MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., join. SWANSON, J., dissents in an opinion in which THOMAS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., join. MAKAR, J., comments with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Jane Doe 13-A, 136 So. 3d 748, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5459, 2014 WL 1408053 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

136 So. 3d 748 (In re Jane Doe 13-A) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott Anthony Mitchell v. Taylor N. Brogden
249 So. 3d 781 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Gretna Racing, LLC. v. Department of Business and Prof. etc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015