In re Jane Doe 13-A

District Court of Appeal of Florida

In re Jane Doe 13-A

136 So. 3d 723, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5409, 2014 WL 1396590

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 11, 2014

DocketNo. 1D13-5458

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 136 So. 3d 723 (In re Jane Doe 13-A) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jane Doe 13-A, 136 So. 3d 723, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5409, 2014 WL 1396590 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a minor, seeks review of the trial court’s order denying her petition for judicial waiver under section 390.01114, Florida Statutes (2013), the “Parental Notice of Abortion Act.” We conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the petition for the reasons stated in the order on appeal. Accordingly, we reverse the order on appeal and remand for entry of an order granting the petition and authorizing Appellant to consent to the termination of her pregnancy without notification of a parent or guardian.

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

ROBERTS, J., CONCURS IN RESULT WITH OPINION; WETHERELL, J., CONCURS WITH OPINION; MAKAR, J., DISSENTS WITH OPINION.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a minor, seeks review of the trial court’s order denying her petition for judicial waiver under section 390.01114, Florida Statutes (2013), the “Parental Notice of Abortion Act.” We conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the petition for the reasons stated in the order on appeal. Accordingly, we reverse the order on appeal and remand for entry of an order granting the petition and authorizing Appellant to consent to the termination of her pregnancy without notification of a parent or guardian.

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

ROBERTS, J., CONCURS IN RESULT WITH OPINION; WETHERELL, J., CONCURS WITH OPINION; MAKAR, J., DISSENTS WITH OPINION.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 So. 3d 723, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5409, 2014 WL 1396590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jane-doe-13-a-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack