in Re James Clinton Coyle, Janice Presley Coyle A/K/A Janice Presley and Cody Presley
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 4, 2019
No. 04-19-00553-CV
IN RE James Clinton COYLE, Janice Presley Coyle a/k/a Janice Presley and Cody Presley
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
On August 19, 2019, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
It is so ORDERED on September 4, 2019.
_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of September, 2019.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 17-12-24620-CV, styled Coyle Family Farm, Inc., et al. v. James Clinton Coyle, et al., pending in the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas, the Honorable H. Paul Canales presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re James Clinton Coyle, Janice Presley Coyle A/K/A Janice Presley and Cody Presley (in Re James Clinton Coyle, Janice Presley Coyle A/K/A Janice Presley and Cody Presley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.