in Re James Clinton Coyle, Janice Presley Coyle A/K/A Janice Presley and Cody Presley
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00439-CV
IN RE James Clinton COYLE, Janice Presley Coyle a/k/a Janice Presley and Cody Presley
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 17, 2019
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On June 28, 2019, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus, in which relators requested
a stay of “any and all enforcement.” After considering the petition, this court concludes relators
are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The request for a stay is denied as moot.
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 17-12-24620-CV, styled Coyle Family Farm, Inc., et al. v. James Clinton Coyle, et al., pending in the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas, the Honorable H. Paul Canales presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re James Clinton Coyle, Janice Presley Coyle A/K/A Janice Presley and Cody Presley (in Re James Clinton Coyle, Janice Presley Coyle A/K/A Janice Presley and Cody Presley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.