in Re: Jaime Luevano
This text of in Re: Jaime Luevano (in Re: Jaime Luevano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§
§ IN RE: JAIME LUEVANO, No. 08-09-00301-CR § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING Relator. § IN MANDAMUS §
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Relator has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus requesting this Court to compel the
Judge of the 120th Judicial District Court to produce “indictments.”
Relief by writ of mandamus will only granted in extraordinary circumstances where the
Relator is able to establish the trial court has clearly abused its discretion, and no adequate remedy
at law exists. See State ex. rel Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana, 236
S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007). Based on the petition and record before us, we are unable
to conclude that Relator is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, mandamus relief is denied.
See TEX .R.APP.P. 58.2(a).
Also pending before the Court, is Relator’s, “Emergency Motion to Expedite-To Amend- To
Appoint Counsel-Etc.” Given the disposition of Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, this motion
is denied.
January 20, 2010 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Jaime Luevano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jaime-luevano-texapp-2010.