In re Iris R.
This text of 309 N.E.2d 140 (In re Iris R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the petition dismissed, without costs to either party.
In this case the determination of the fact-finding hearing utilized as its basis the preponderance of evidence standard. The Corporation Counsel, with commendable candor, points out that this court has said, “ proof beyond a reasonable doubt is constitutionally required for an adjudication that a minor is a person in need of supervision (see, In re Winship, 397 U. S. 358) ” (Matter of Richard S., 27 N Y 2d 802). Counsel observes this would seem to require reversal. We agree.
In light of the disposition herein made we deem it unnecessary to reach the other issues raised by appellant.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Babin and Stevens concur in memorandum.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
309 N.E.2d 140, 33 N.Y.2d 987, 353 N.Y.S.2d 743, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-iris-r-ny-1974.