in Re INVISTA S.A.R.L.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00351-CV ____________________
IN RE INVISTA S.A.R.L.
_______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 136th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. D-201,939 ________________________________________________________ _____________
ORDER
INVISTA S.à.r.l. filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The relator is a
respondent in a Rule 202 proceeding in Cause Number D-201939, Jacqulyn
McDonald, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of David Lee McDonald
v. INVISTA S.à.r.l. d/b/a INVISTA S.à.r.l., LLC, et al. Relator seeks a writ
compelling the Honorable Baylor Wortham, Judge of the 136th District Court, to
vacate its order requiring relator to produce a witness for deposition and subpoena
duces tecum. We note our jurisdiction over this matter and the parties. See Tex.
Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2017).
1 Relator requests that the deposition be stayed as temporary relief. See Tex. R.
App. P. 52.10(a). The Court finds temporary relief is necessary to prevent undue
prejudice. It is ORDERED that the deposition and subpoena duces tecum of the
representative of INVISTA S.à.r.l. is STAYED until our Opinion issues or until
further order of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b). No bond is required of
the relator as a condition to any relief herein granted.
The response of the real party in interest, Jacqulyn McDonald, is due
September 21, 2018.
MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED.
ORDER ENTERED September 11, 2018.
PER CURIAM
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re INVISTA S.A.R.L. (in Re INVISTA S.A.R.L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.