In re Initiative Petition No. 396, State Question No. 763

2012 OK 67, 281 P.3d 1275, 2012 WL 2505284, 2012 Okla. LEXIS 67
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJune 28, 2012
DocketNos. 110610, 110611
StatusPublished

This text of 2012 OK 67 (In re Initiative Petition No. 396, State Question No. 763) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Initiative Petition No. 396, State Question No. 763, 2012 OK 67, 281 P.3d 1275, 2012 WL 2505284, 2012 Okla. LEXIS 67 (Okla. 2012).

Opinions

ORDER

{1 Pursuant to 34 O.8.2011, 8(B), and after examining the briefs and hearing the oral argument of June 21, 2012, this Court finds that Initiative Petition No. 896, State Question No. 768 does not violate the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma, nor the Constitution of the United States.

2 The single subject rule found in Article 24, § 1 of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma is not violated. We find that all portions of the proposed amendment are germane to the subject of Initiative Petition No. 396, State Question No. 7638.

13 The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States is not violated. Neither an invidious classification nor any deprivation of a fundamental interest is shown, and there is a rational basis for the provisions within Initiative Petition No. 396, State Question No. 763.

CONCUR: KAUGER, WINCHESTER, EDMONDSON, REIF and GURICH, JJ. DISSENT: TAYLOR, C.J., (The provisions of this initiative petition violate the Constitutional mandates of strict regulation of alcohol, single subject rule and Equal Protection. I would not approve it.), COLBERT, V.C.J. (by separate writing), WATT, J. and COMBS, J. (by separate writing).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wesberry v. Sanders
376 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1964)
Coalition for Equal Rights, Inc. v. Ritter
517 F.3d 1195 (Tenth Circuit, 2008)
Jacobs Ranch, L.L.C. v. Smith
2006 OK 34 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2006)
City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations Board
2006 OK 16 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2006)
Meyer v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission
1995 OK CIV APP 11 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1995)
Burks v. Walker
1909 OK 317 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)
Wilson v. State ex rel. State Election Board
2012 OK 2 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2012 OK 67, 281 P.3d 1275, 2012 WL 2505284, 2012 Okla. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-initiative-petition-no-396-state-question-no-763-okla-2012.