In re Hurt

520 F. App'x 224
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Hurt. Read the opinion of the Court — 531 F. App'x 358
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 6, 2013·No. No. 12-2532·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the district court to act on two cases filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. He gives no details about those cases other than their docket numbers. Following a thorough review of the district court docket sheets, we conclude that there is no pending matter awaiting a ruling in either case. See Hurt v. Dedley & Singletary, Inc., No. 1:08-cv-00917-LMB-JFA (E.D.Va.); Hurt v. Clinton, No. 1:08-cv-01050-LMB-TCB, 2008 WL 9007257 (E.D.Va.2008). Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hurt, 520 F. App'x 224 (4th Cir. 2013).

520 F. App'x 224 (In re Hurt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.