In re Hurt

531 F. App'x 358
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 1, 2013·No. No. 13-1208·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order imposing a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. In re: Hurt, No. 8:12-mc-00512 (D.Md. Jan. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hurt, 531 F. App'x 358 (4th Cir. 2013).

531 F. App'x 358 (In re Hurt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sanderford v. Duplin Land Dev., Inc.
789 S.E.2d 503 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2016)