In re Hurt
This text of 520 F. App'x 224 (In re Hurt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Tyrone Hurt petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the district court to act on two cases filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. He gives no details about those cases other than their docket numbers. Following a thorough review of the district court docket sheets, we conclude that there is no pending matter awaiting a ruling in either case. See Hurt v. Dedley & Singletary, Inc., No. 1:08-cv-00917-LMB-JFA (E.D.Va.); Hurt v. Clinton, No. 1:08-cv-01050-LMB-TCB, 2008 WL 9007257 (E.D.Va.2008). Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
520 F. App'x 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hurt-ca4-2013.