In re Howard

Fourth Circuit

In re Howard

538 F. App'x 312

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 26, 2013

DocketNo. 13-1541

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 538 F. App'x 312 (In re Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Howard, 538 F. App'x 312 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Andre J. Howard petitions for an extraordinary writ pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2006). We conclude that relief is not warranted. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Andre J. Howard petitions for an extraordinary writ pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2006). We conclude that relief is not warranted. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

538 F. App'x 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-howard-ca4-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack