In re Howard

Fourth Circuit

In re Howard

538 F. App'x 312

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2013·No. No. 13-1541·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Andre J. Howard petitions for an extraordinary writ pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2006). We conclude that relief is not warranted. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Andre J. Howard petitions for an extraordinary writ pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2006). We conclude that relief is not warranted. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Howard, 538 F. App'x 312 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

538 F. App'x 312 (In re Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related