In re HK and KK
This text of In re HK and KK (In re HK and KK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 19-NOV-2019 08:12 AM
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
In the Interest of HK and KK (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX)
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the Matter of the Guardianship of HK and KK (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX)
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CASE NOS. FC-S No. 16-00210 and FC-G No. 18-1-6064)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-
referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate
Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of
certiorari was filed, see Hawai i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a)
(2017); see also Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule
36(b)(1) (2016),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s application for
writ of certiorari, filed on November 14, 2019, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP
Rule 40.1(a) (2017) (“The application shall be filed within 30
days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’
judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for
filing the application is extended in accordance with this
Rule.”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, November 19, 2019.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re HK and KK, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hk-and-kk-haw-2019.