In re HK and KK
This text of In re HK and KK (In re HK and KK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 17-JAN-2020 02:22 PM
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
In the Interest of HK and KK (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the Matter of the Guardianship of HK and KK (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX)
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CASE NOS. FC-S No. 16-00210 and FC-G No. 18-1-6064)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Father-Appellant’s application for writ of
certiorari, filed on December 11, 2019, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 17, 2020.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re HK and KK, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hk-and-kk-haw-2020.