Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re Hitchcock

In re Hitchcock

677 N.E.2d 815, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1455, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 936
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Hitchcock. Read the opinion of the Court — 81 Ohio St. 3d 1476 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 9, 1997·No. 96-2641·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 69291 and 69292. (Appeal of Joanne Canitia Brady on behalf of Shampail and Hastings Hitchcock; and appeal of Abdul and Mary Abdullah.) The appeals are allowed and the [1456]*1456motion to vacate stay of proceedings is denied.

Resnick and Cook, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hitchcock, 677 N.E.2d 815, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1455, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 936 (Ohio 1997).

677 N.E.2d 815 (In re Hitchcock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.