In re Hitchcock

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Hitchcock

672 N.E.2d 1119, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1462

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 5, 1996

Docket96-2641

StatusPublished

This text of 672 N.E.2d 1119 (In re Hitchcock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Hitchcock, 672 N.E.2d 1119, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1462 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 69291 and 69292. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to stay proceedings pending this appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to stay proceedings be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the proceedings in the Probate Court of Cuyahoga County be, and hereby are; stayed pending disposition of this appeal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the original and exclusive jurisdiction of the juvenile court for the care and protection of Shampail Hitchcock and Hasting Hitchcock be, and hereby is, restored pending further order of this court.

Cook, J., would grant the stay pending determination of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 69291 and 69292. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to stay proceedings pending this appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to stay proceedings be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the proceedings in the Probate Court of Cuyahoga County be, and hereby are; stayed pending disposition of this appeal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the original and exclusive jurisdiction of the juvenile court for the care and protection of Shampail Hitchcock and Hasting Hitchcock be, and hereby is, restored pending further order of this court.

Cook, J., would grant the stay pending determination of jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

672 N.E.2d 1119, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hitchcock-ohio-1996.