In re Highway

3 N.J.L. 699
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 15, 1810·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

— The act of Assembly does not take away from this Court its superintending authority over the proceedings of the applicants for the road, or of the sur[515]*515veyors. The office of the chosen freeholders is only intended to review the merits of the subject in controversy, and rejudge the propriety of laying out the road; both rules are proper. Rules allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Highway, 3 N.J.L. 699 (N.J. 1810).

3 N.J.L. 699 (In re Highway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.