In re Hernandez

753 A.2d 1014, 2000 D.C. App. LEXIS 133, 2000 WL 728822
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided June 8, 2000·No. No. 98-BG-1549·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In its Report and Recommendation, a copy of which is attached hereto, the Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that Humberto Hernandez, a member of the District of Columbia Bar, be disbarred on account of his conviction of a crime of moral turpitude. Neither Bar Counsel nor Hernandez filed an exception to the recommendation. See In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285, 1287 (D.C.1995). Substantially for the reasons stated by the Board, we conclude that the conspiracy offense to which Hernandez entered a plea of guilty involves moral turpitude within the meaning of D.C.Code § 11 — 2508(a) (1995). Accordingly, we adopt the recommendation of the Board, and Humberto Hernandez is hereby disbarred.

So ordered. 1

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hernandez, 753 A.2d 1014, 2000 D.C. App. LEXIS 133, 2000 WL 728822 (D.C. 2000).

753 A.2d 1014 (In re Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Goldsborough
654 A.2d 1285 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1995)