In re Hensel
24 A.D.3d 1324, 805 N.Y.S.2d 865
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order of disbarment entered. Memorandum: Respondent’s unexcused failure to appear or answer the petition constitutes a default (see Matter of Wedlock, 230 AD2d 422 [1997]; see also Matter of Frank, 9 AD3d 916 [2004]; Matter of Cary, 7 AD3d 24 [2004]; Matter of Gaesser, 6 AD3d 1246 [2004]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Martoche and Smith, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Hensel, 24 A.D.3d 1324, 805 N.Y.S.2d 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).
24 A.D.3d 1324 (In re Hensel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Termini
28 A.D.3d 1256 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)