In re Frank
9 A.D.3d 916, 779 N.Y.S.2d 397, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9513
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 9, 2004·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order of disbarment entered. Memorandum: Respondent’s unexcused failure to appear or answer the petition constitutes a default (see Matter of Gaesser, 6 AD3d 1246 [2004]). Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Frank, 9 A.D.3d 916, 779 N.Y.S.2d 397, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9513 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).
9 A.D.3d 916 (In re Frank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Hensel
24 A.D.3d 1324 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re Meinzer
23 A.D.3d 1158 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re Hogan
21 A.D.3d 1440 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)