In re Harwood
2006 VT 15, 895 A.2d 192, 179 Vt. 618, 2006 Vt. LEXIS 29
Opinion
¶ 1. On November 30, 2005, a hearing panel of the Profes[619]*619sional Responsibility Board issued a decision ordering that respondent George Harwood, Esq., be disbarred from the office of attorney and counselor at law effective forty-five days from the date of the order. Respondent has not appealed from that order, and this Court has declined review on its own motion. Therefore, pursuant to Administrative Order 9, Rule U.D(5)(e), the order of disbarment is final, and shall have the full force and effect as an order of this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Harwood, 2006 VT 15, 895 A.2d 192, 179 Vt. 618, 2006 Vt. LEXIS 29 (Vt. 2006).
2006 VT 15 (In re Harwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bircwhood Land Dev. Corp. v. Ormond Bushey & Sons, Inc.
Vermont Superior Court, 2011
Hawk's Nest South, LLP Conditional Use/PUD Applications
Vermont Superior Court, 2010
Hawk's Nest South, LLP Condition Use PUD
Vermont Superior Court, 2010