In re Harwood

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Harwood

2006 VT 15, 895 A.2d 192, 179 Vt. 618, 2006 Vt. LEXIS 29

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedFebruary 3, 2006

DocketNo. 05-534

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 2006 VT 15 (In re Harwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Harwood, 2006 VT 15, 895 A.2d 192, 179 Vt. 618, 2006 Vt. LEXIS 29 (Vt. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

¶ 1. On November 30, 2005, a hearing panel of the Profes[619]*619sional Responsibility Board issued a decision ordering that respondent George Harwood, Esq., be disbarred from the office of attorney and counselor at law effective forty-five days from the date of the order. Respondent has not appealed from that order, and this Court has declined review on its own motion. Therefore, pursuant to Administrative Order 9, Rule U.D(5)(e), the order of disbarment is final, and shall have the full force and effect as an order of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1. On November 30, 2005, a hearing panel of the Profes[619]*619sional Responsibility Board issued a decision ordering that respondent George Harwood, Esq., be disbarred from the office of attorney and counselor at law effective forty-five days from the date of the order. Respondent has not appealed from that order, and this Court has declined review on its own motion. Therefore, pursuant to Administrative Order 9, Rule U.D(5)(e), the order of disbarment is final, and shall have the full force and effect as an order of this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2006 VT 15, 895 A.2d 192, 179 Vt. 618, 2006 Vt. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-harwood-vt-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack