in Re Harlan Levien, Stephen Levien, Kenneth Ives, and Parvin Johnson, Jr.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-16-00416-CV
In re Harlan Levien, Stephen Levien, Kenneth Ives, and Parvin Johnson, Jr.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BASTROP COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relators Harlan Levien, Stephen Levien, Kenneth Ives, and Parvin Johnson, Jr., filed
a petition for writ of mandamus seeking review of the district court’s orders granting a motion to
continue a summary-judgment hearing and denying a joint motion for protective order and motion
to quash deposition notices, and they also filed a motion for emergency relief asking this Court to
stay the underlying trial proceedings, including discovery and previously scheduled depositions
of the Relators. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1-.3, .10. In a previous order, we granted the motion for
emergency relief and stayed the underlying trial proceedings pending further action by this Court.
See id. R. 52.10. In addition, we requested that the real parties in interest, Kenneth Levien, Barry
Levien, and Phillip Levien, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. Having reviewed the
petition, the response, and the record, we dissolve our stay and deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field
Filed: August 26, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Harlan Levien, Stephen Levien, Kenneth Ives, and Parvin Johnson, Jr. (in Re Harlan Levien, Stephen Levien, Kenneth Ives, and Parvin Johnson, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.