in Re Harlan Levien, Stephen Levien, Kenneth Ives, and Parvin Johnson, Jr.
This text of in Re Harlan Levien, Stephen Levien, Kenneth Ives, and Parvin Johnson, Jr. (in Re Harlan Levien, Stephen Levien, Kenneth Ives, and Parvin Johnson, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-16-00416-CV
In re Harlan Levien, Stephen Levien, Kenneth Ives, and Parvin Johnson, Jr.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BASTROP COUNTY
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Relators Harlan Levien, Stephen Levien, Kenneth Ives, and Parvin Johnson, Jr., have
filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking review of the district court’s orders granting a motion
to continue a summary-judgment hearing and denying a joint motion for protective order and
motion to quash and filed a motion for emergency relief asking this Court to stay the underlying
trial proceedings, including discovery and previously scheduled depositions of the relators. See
Tex. R. App. P. 52.1-.3, .10. We grant the motion for emergency relief and stay the underlying
trial proceedings pending further order of this Court. See id. R. 52.10. The real parties in interest,
Kenneth Levien, Barry Levien, and Phillip Levien, are requested to file a response to the petition for
writ of mandamus on or before July 20, 2016.
It is ordered June 21, 2016.
Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Harlan Levien, Stephen Levien, Kenneth Ives, and Parvin Johnson, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-harlan-levien-stephen-levien-kenneth-ives-and-parvin-johnson-jr-texapp-2016.