In Re Hand

52 B.R. 65, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 5394
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedSeptember 4, 1985
DocketBankruptcy 85-744-Orl-BK-GP
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 52 B.R. 65 (In Re Hand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Hand, 52 B.R. 65, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 5394 (Fla. 1985).

Opinion

ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM STAY OF ACTION AND LIEN ENFORCEMENT

GEORGE L. PROCTOR, Bankruptcy Judge.

This issue comes before the Court on the motion of Citicorp Person-to-Person Financial Center of Florida, Inc., for relief from stay of action to enforce lien and have Certificate of Title issued under 11 U.S.C. § 108(b) and § 362 in this Chapter 13 case. The facts before this Court show that on June 6, 1985, First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Seminole County foreclosed on the subject property as first and second mortgagee. Reynold F. Hand, Jr.; his wife, Janice G. Hand; Citicorp Person-to-Person Financial Center of Florida, Inc.; and Barnett Bank of Central Florida, N.A., were named as defendants in the foreclosure action. John G. Sturno bid $80,-000.00 for said property and deposited that amount in the Registry of the Circuit Court. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Title, the Hands filed a voluntary Chapter 13 petition on June 28, 1985. On July 23, 1985, Citicorp filed this motion for relief from stay and lien enforcement.

In making its decision, this Court relies upon the Eighth Circuit decisions submitted by movant, Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, Minnesota, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983) and Martinson v. First National Bank of Oakes, 731 F.2d 543 (8th Cir.1984), and upon Matter of Sarasota Land Co., 36 B.R. 563 (M.D.Fla.1983) and Matter of Construction Leasing and Investment Corp., 20 B.R. 546 (M.D.Fl.1982). This Court finds that § 108(b) governs the time period in which the debtors retain the right to redeem and that § 362 does not suspend the period of redemption provided under Florida law. Accordingly, immediately upon filing § 108(b) automatically gave the debtors 60 days in which they could exercise their right to redeem the property. This 60 days ran as of August 27, 1985. At no time during this 60 days did the debtors exercise their right to redeem or ask the Court for permission to redeem. This Court is of the opinion that due to the debtors failure to redeem within the 60 days, the right to redeem was terminated and the debtors interest in the property was permanently extinguished. This Court is without authority to suspend this period of redemption indefinitely and thus finds that the right is no longer part of the estate.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the stay is lifted as to subject property pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 108(b) and § 362 to allow is *67 suance of the Certificate of Title by the . Circuit Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Max v. Northington (In Re Northington)
876 F.3d 1302 (Eleventh Circuit, 2017)
Title Max v. Gustavius A. Wilber
Eleventh Circuit, 2017
In re Catalano
510 B.R. 654 (M.D. Florida, 2014)
Cash America Pawn, L.P. v. Murph
209 B.R. 419 (E.D. Texas, 1997)
In Re Walker
204 B.R. 812 (M.D. Florida, 1997)
First Constitution Bank v. Flanders, No. Cv 910310164s (Mar. 22, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2832 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
In Re Henke
84 B.R. 693 (D. Montana, 1988)
In Re Farmer
81 B.R. 857 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1988)
In Re Trust No. 101b
77 B.R. 973 (S.D. Florida, 1987)
In Re Westmore
75 B.R. 110 (N.D. Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 B.R. 65, 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 5394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-hand-flmb-1985.