ORDER
JAMES R. SACCA, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court is the Movant’s Motion for Relief from Stay [Doc. No. 11] (the “Motion”) to proceed with the foreclosure of the equity of redemption with respect to Debtor’s residence located at 4690 Kent Road, NW, College Park, Fulton County, GA, 30331 (the “Property”), title to which Movant acquired at a tax sale on February 2, 2010. The matter came on for hearing on April 21, 2011. The parties stipulated the facts and certain exhibits and the matter was taken under advisement. In addition to the Motion, stipulations, exhibits and arguments of counsel, the Court has considered Debtor’s “Brief in Response to Court’s Direction” [Doc. No. 27], the Mov-ant’s “Brief in Support of Motion for Relief from Stay” [Doc. No. 28] and all other matters of record.
In the Motion, the Movant seeks relief from the automatic stay under § 362(d) of the Bankruptcy Code to complete the statutory proceeding under Georgia law to foreclose the equity of redemption in connection with a tax sale of the Property pursuant to O.C.G.A. §§ 48-4-40 to -48 (the “Barment Statutes”). Accordingly, the Court must determine the parties’ respective interests in the Property; whether, or under what circumstances, the Property may be redeemed; and whether the parties have m'et their respective burdens under § 362(d).
FINDINGS OF FACT
The Debtor filed her Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition on February 18, 2011. Movant is the holder of a tax deed (the “Deed”) on the Property from the Sheriff of Fulton County, Georgia dated February 2, 2010 and recorded on April 8, 2010. Hr’g Ex. 3. The Deed was acquired by Movant at a Sheriffs tax sale (the “Sale”) after it successfully purchased the Property, having bid the amount of $11,000. The tax sale of the Property was based upon a
fien facias
for unpaid state and county taxes for tax year 2005 in the principal amount of $948.07. Hr’g Ex. 2. Debtor’s “Schedule A-Real Property” lists the Property as an asset in which the Debtor
asserts she has a fee simple interest with a value of $55,000. [Docket No. 17]. On her “Schedule D-Creditors Holding Secured Claims,” she has listed “HFC” as the holder of a mortgage on the Property in the amount $74,000.
Id.
Movant is listed by Debtor on her “Schedule E-Creditors Holding Unsecured Priority Claims,” with a claim of $15,000.
Id.
Debtor’s Amended Chapter 13 Plan [Doc. No. 19] (the “Plan”) provides for Movant to receive payment of $15,000 over a period of 36 months as a priority tax claimant. The hearing on the confirmation of Debtor’s Plan is scheduled for August 25, 2011.
On February 21, 2011, three days after Debtor filed her bankruptcy petition, the Movant’s “Notice of Foreclosure of Equity of Redemption” (the “Barment Notice”) was served by tacking a copy on the front door of the Property. Hr’g Ex. 1. Pursuant to O.C.G.A. §§ 48-4-45
and -46,
the
Barment Notice indicated that the right to redeem the Property will be forever barred unless the redemption price was paid on or before April 2, 2011.
Movant filed the Motion on March 22, 2011 in which Movant alleges that,
inter alia,
the Movant is the owner of the Property rather than merely being the holder of a secured or priority claim, that the price to redeem the Property at the time of the filing of the Motion was approximately $13,200, that the Debtor’s only interest in the Property is her equity of redemption and that the automatic stay should be terminated to permit Movant to protect its interest in the Property as the owner by permitting it to foreclose the equity of redemption as set forth in the Barment Notice pursuant to the Barment Statutes.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
A. The Parties’ Respective Interests in the Property
Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 541(a), upon the filing of a voluntary petition by a debtor, an estate is created which is comprised of “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property” at that time. State law controls whether or to what extent a debtor has a legal or equitable interest in property at the commencement of a bankruptcy case.
See Butner v. U.S.,
440 U.S. 48, 55, 99 S.Ct. 914, 59 L.Ed.2d 136 (1979).
The Barment Statutes are the applicable Georgia law to determine the Debtor’s interest in the Property. The Barment Statutes provide that when real property is sold for the collection of delinquent taxes, any person having any right, title or interest in or lien upon the property has a right to redeem the property by paying the redemption price up until the holder of the tax deed forecloses on that right.
See
O.C.G.A. § 48-4-48.
The
holder of a tax deed cannot commence the foreclosure process set forth in O.C.G.A. §§ 48-4-45 and -46 until after the passing of 12 months time from the date of the tax sale. Pursuant to the Barment Statutes, if the redemption price is not timely paid, any person who could redeem the property is forever barred from doing so and fee simple title to the property is vested in the holder of the tax deed upon the earlier of either: (a) the completion of the foreclosure process under O.C.G.A. §§ 48-4-45 and -46
or (b) the passage of four years from the recordation of the tax deed if the holder of the tax deed does not commence and complete the foreclosure process under O.C.G.A. §§ 48-4-45 and -46 within said four-year period.
See
O.C.G.A. §§ 48-4-40 to -48. Accordingly, until such time as the right to redeem is terminated pursuant to the Barment Statutes, the tax deed vests the purchaser with an inchoate or defeasible interest in the property, subject to the right of redemption, but it does not vest the purchaser with the immediate and exclusive right to possession.
Nat’l Tax Funding, L.P. v. Harpagon Co., LLC.,
277 Ga. 41, 43, 586 S.E.2d 235, 238 (2003);
BX Corp. v. Hickory Hill 1185, LLC.,
285 Ga. 5, 7, 673 S.E.2d 205, 207 (2009).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ORDER
JAMES R. SACCA, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court is the Movant’s Motion for Relief from Stay [Doc. No. 11] (the “Motion”) to proceed with the foreclosure of the equity of redemption with respect to Debtor’s residence located at 4690 Kent Road, NW, College Park, Fulton County, GA, 30331 (the “Property”), title to which Movant acquired at a tax sale on February 2, 2010. The matter came on for hearing on April 21, 2011. The parties stipulated the facts and certain exhibits and the matter was taken under advisement. In addition to the Motion, stipulations, exhibits and arguments of counsel, the Court has considered Debtor’s “Brief in Response to Court’s Direction” [Doc. No. 27], the Mov-ant’s “Brief in Support of Motion for Relief from Stay” [Doc. No. 28] and all other matters of record.
In the Motion, the Movant seeks relief from the automatic stay under § 362(d) of the Bankruptcy Code to complete the statutory proceeding under Georgia law to foreclose the equity of redemption in connection with a tax sale of the Property pursuant to O.C.G.A. §§ 48-4-40 to -48 (the “Barment Statutes”). Accordingly, the Court must determine the parties’ respective interests in the Property; whether, or under what circumstances, the Property may be redeemed; and whether the parties have m'et their respective burdens under § 362(d).
FINDINGS OF FACT
The Debtor filed her Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition on February 18, 2011. Movant is the holder of a tax deed (the “Deed”) on the Property from the Sheriff of Fulton County, Georgia dated February 2, 2010 and recorded on April 8, 2010. Hr’g Ex. 3. The Deed was acquired by Movant at a Sheriffs tax sale (the “Sale”) after it successfully purchased the Property, having bid the amount of $11,000. The tax sale of the Property was based upon a
fien facias
for unpaid state and county taxes for tax year 2005 in the principal amount of $948.07. Hr’g Ex. 2. Debtor’s “Schedule A-Real Property” lists the Property as an asset in which the Debtor
asserts she has a fee simple interest with a value of $55,000. [Docket No. 17]. On her “Schedule D-Creditors Holding Secured Claims,” she has listed “HFC” as the holder of a mortgage on the Property in the amount $74,000.
Id.
Movant is listed by Debtor on her “Schedule E-Creditors Holding Unsecured Priority Claims,” with a claim of $15,000.
Id.
Debtor’s Amended Chapter 13 Plan [Doc. No. 19] (the “Plan”) provides for Movant to receive payment of $15,000 over a period of 36 months as a priority tax claimant. The hearing on the confirmation of Debtor’s Plan is scheduled for August 25, 2011.
On February 21, 2011, three days after Debtor filed her bankruptcy petition, the Movant’s “Notice of Foreclosure of Equity of Redemption” (the “Barment Notice”) was served by tacking a copy on the front door of the Property. Hr’g Ex. 1. Pursuant to O.C.G.A. §§ 48-4-45
and -46,
the
Barment Notice indicated that the right to redeem the Property will be forever barred unless the redemption price was paid on or before April 2, 2011.
Movant filed the Motion on March 22, 2011 in which Movant alleges that,
inter alia,
the Movant is the owner of the Property rather than merely being the holder of a secured or priority claim, that the price to redeem the Property at the time of the filing of the Motion was approximately $13,200, that the Debtor’s only interest in the Property is her equity of redemption and that the automatic stay should be terminated to permit Movant to protect its interest in the Property as the owner by permitting it to foreclose the equity of redemption as set forth in the Barment Notice pursuant to the Barment Statutes.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
A. The Parties’ Respective Interests in the Property
Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 541(a), upon the filing of a voluntary petition by a debtor, an estate is created which is comprised of “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property” at that time. State law controls whether or to what extent a debtor has a legal or equitable interest in property at the commencement of a bankruptcy case.
See Butner v. U.S.,
440 U.S. 48, 55, 99 S.Ct. 914, 59 L.Ed.2d 136 (1979).
The Barment Statutes are the applicable Georgia law to determine the Debtor’s interest in the Property. The Barment Statutes provide that when real property is sold for the collection of delinquent taxes, any person having any right, title or interest in or lien upon the property has a right to redeem the property by paying the redemption price up until the holder of the tax deed forecloses on that right.
See
O.C.G.A. § 48-4-48.
The
holder of a tax deed cannot commence the foreclosure process set forth in O.C.G.A. §§ 48-4-45 and -46 until after the passing of 12 months time from the date of the tax sale. Pursuant to the Barment Statutes, if the redemption price is not timely paid, any person who could redeem the property is forever barred from doing so and fee simple title to the property is vested in the holder of the tax deed upon the earlier of either: (a) the completion of the foreclosure process under O.C.G.A. §§ 48-4-45 and -46
or (b) the passage of four years from the recordation of the tax deed if the holder of the tax deed does not commence and complete the foreclosure process under O.C.G.A. §§ 48-4-45 and -46 within said four-year period.
See
O.C.G.A. §§ 48-4-40 to -48. Accordingly, until such time as the right to redeem is terminated pursuant to the Barment Statutes, the tax deed vests the purchaser with an inchoate or defeasible interest in the property, subject to the right of redemption, but it does not vest the purchaser with the immediate and exclusive right to possession.
Nat’l Tax Funding, L.P. v. Harpagon Co., LLC.,
277 Ga. 41, 43, 586 S.E.2d 235, 238 (2003);
BX Corp. v. Hickory Hill 1185, LLC.,
285 Ga. 5, 7, 673 S.E.2d 205, 207 (2009). After the expiration of the redemption period set forth in the Barment Statutes, the purchaser holds indefeasible fee simple title to the property and the exclusive right to possession.
Nat’l Tax Funding,
277 Ga. at 43, 586 S.E.2d at 238;
BX Corp.,
285 Ga. at 7, 673 S.E.2d at 207.
If a debtor files for bankruptcy protection while he or she still has a right to redeem the property, then that right to redeem becomes property of the debtor’s estate.
See Commercial Fed. Mortg. Corp. v. Smith,
85 F.3d 1555, 1558 (11th Cir.1996). Here, the Debtor was the record owner of the Property when it was purchased by the Movant at the Sale on February 2, 2010. After the Sale, the Movant held the defeasible fee interest in the Property subject to the right to redeem the Property. Because the Movant had not foreclosed on the right to redeem the Property when the Debtor’s bankruptcy petition was filed on February 18, 2011, the Debtor’s right to redeem the Property became property of the Debtor’s estate.
B. Application of the Automatic Stay
Because the Barment Notice was served after the commencement of the instant case, the service of the Barment Notice is void pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a).
See Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Hall,
685 F.2d 1306, 1308 (11th Cir.1982). Because O.C.G.A. § 48-4-45
requires that the Sheriff serve the Barment Notice within 15 days of its receipt by the Sheriff and the Barment Notice must provide a deadline of no less than 45 days from its issuance within which the redemption price can be paid, a new Barment Notice would have to be issued and served to recommence the foreclosure process under O.C.G.A. § 48-4-45 in the event the automatic stay of § 362 is lifted. In the alternative, notwithstanding the stay of § 362(a), Movant could obtain indefeasible fee simple title by operation of law pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 48-4-48 on the fourth anniversary of the recordation of its tax deed, that being April 8, 2014, if the redemption price is not paid in the interim.
Consequently, the Court must consider whether to grant Movant relief from the automatic stay to recommence the barment proceedings under O.C.G.A. §§ 48-4-45 and -46.
Pursuant to § 362(d), relief from the automatic stay may be granted (1) for cause, including the lack of adequate protection of an interest in property of such party in interest or (2)(A) if the debtor does not have any equity in the property and (B) such property is not necessary to an effective reorganization. Because the Property is the Debtor’s residence and there is no evidence yet that Debtor cannot confirm a Chapter 13 plan, the Property, and the equity of redemption with respect thereto, is necessary to an effective reorganization, so the Movant cannot prevail at this time under § 362(d)(2). Because Debtor has valued ■the Property at $55,000, which value has not been contested, and Movant’s interest in the Property, based on the allegation in the Motion, can be satisfied at this time for approximately $13,200, plus accruing interest, the Court finds that Movant is ade
quately protected, so cause does not exist at this time for relief from the automatic stay to be granted under § 362(d)(1). Based on the forgoing, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Movant’s Motion is DENIED, without prejudice to its rights to seek similar or other relief in the future, including, but not limited to, renewing the Motion, objecting to confirmation of the Plan and moving to dismiss the case.
IT IS ORDERED.