In Re Guantanamo Detainee Cases

344 F. Supp. 2d 174, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22525, 2004 WL 2525136
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedNovember 8, 2004
Docket1:02-cr-00299
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 344 F. Supp. 2d 174 (In Re Guantanamo Detainee Cases) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Guantanamo Detainee Cases, 344 F. Supp. 2d 174, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22525, 2004 WL 2525136 (D.D.C. 2004).

Opinion

AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER AND PROCEDURES FOR COUNSEL ACCESS TO DETAINEES AT THE UNITED STATES NAVAL BASE IN GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA

JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon Respondents’ Motion for Protective Order to prevent the unauthorized disclosure or dissemination of classified national security Information and other protected information that may be reviewed by, made available to, or are otherwise in the possession of, the petitioners and/or petitioners’ counsel in these coordinated cases. Pursuant to the general supervisory authority of the Court, in order to protect the national security,' and for good- cause shown,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Court finds that these cases involve classified national security information or documents, the storage, handling and control of which require special security precautions, and access to which requires a security clearance and a “need to know.” These cases may also involye other protected information or documents, the storage, handling and. control of which may require special precautions in order to protect the security of United States government personnel and facilities, and other significant government interests.

2. The purpose of this Protective Order is to establish the procedures that must be followed by all petitioners’ counsel, their respective petitioner(s), ■ all other counsel involved in these cases, translators for the parties, and all other individuals who receive access to classified national security information or documents, or other protected information or documents, in con *176 nection with these eases, including the privilege team as defined in Exhibit A.

3. The procedures set forth in this Protective Order will apply to all aspects of these cases, and may be modified by further order of the Court sua sponte or upon application by any party. The Court will retain continuing jurisdiction to enforce or modify the terms of this Order.

4. Nothing in this Order is intended to or does preclude the use of classified information by the government as otherwise authorized by law outside of these actions.

5. Petitioners’ counsel shall be responsible for advising their employees, the petitioners, and others of the contents of this Protective Order, as appropriate or needed.

6. Petitioners’ counsel are bound by the terms and conditions set forth in the “Revised Procedures For Counsel Access To Detainees At the U.S. Naval Base In Guantanamo Bay, Cuba,” and the procedures for handling mail and documents brought into and out of counsel meetings, attached hereto as Exhibit A. This Protective Order specifically incorporates by reference all terms and conditions established in the procedures contained in Exhibit A to the extent they place limitations on petitioners’ counsel in their access to and interaction with petitioners or handling of information. Any violation of the terms and conditions of those procedures will also be deemed a violation of this Protective Order. This paragraph does not apply with respect to provisions in the procedures contained in Exhibit A that are or have been overridden by the Court.

7. The privilege team shall not disclose to any person any information provided by counsel for a petitioner or by a petitioner, other than information provided in a filing with the Court, unless such information, if it were monitored information, could be disclosed under Section X of Exhibit A. Such disclosure shall be consistent with the provisions of Section X of Exhibit A.

Definitions

8. As used herein, the words “documents” or “information” shall include, but are not limited to, all written or printed matter of any kind, formal or informal, including originals, conforming copies and non-conforming copies (whether different from the original by reason of notation made on such copies or otherwise), and further include, but are not limited to:

a. papers, correspondence, memo-randa, notes, letters, reports, summaries, photographs, maps, charts, graphs, interoffice and intra-office communications, notations of any sort concerning conversations, meetings, or other communications, bulletins, teletypes, telegrams, telefacsimiles, invoices, worksheets, and drafts, alterations, modifications, changes and amendments of any kind to the foregoing;
b. graphic or oral records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to, photographs, charts, graphs, microfiche, microfilm, videotapes, sound recordings of any kind, and motion pictures;
c. electronic, mechanical or electric records of any kind, including, but not limited to, tapes, cassettes, disks, recordings, electronic mail, films, typewriter ribbons, word processing or other computer tapes or disks, and all manner of electronic data processing storage; and
d. information acquired orally.

9. The terms “classified national security information and/or documents,” “classified information” and “classified documents” refer to:

*177 a. any classified document or information that has been classified by any Executive Branch agency in the interests of national security or pursuant to Executive Order, including Executive Order 12958, as amended, or its predecessor Orders as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “SECRET,” or “TOP SECRET,” or additionally controlled as “SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION (SCI),” or any classified information contained in such document;
b. any document or information, regardless of its physical form or characteristics, now or formerly in the possession of a private party that has been derived from United States government information that was classified, regardless of whether such document or information has subsequently been classified by the government pursuant to Executive Order, including Executive Order 12958, as amended, or its predecessor Orders as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “SECRET,” or “TOP SECRET,” or additionally controlled as “SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION (SCI)”;
c. verbal or non-documentary classified information known to the petitioner or petitioners’ counsel; or
d. any document and information as to which the petitioner or petitioners’ counsel have been notified orally or in writing that such documents or information contains classified information.

10.All classified documents, and information contained therein, shall remain classified unless the documents bear a clear indication that they have been declassified by the agency or department that is the original classification authority of the document or the information contained therein (hereinafter, the “original classification authority”).

11. The terms “protected information and/or documents,” “protected information” and “protected documents” refer to any document or information deemed by the Court, either upon application by counsel or sua sponte, as worthy of special treatment as if the document or information were classified, even if the document or information has not been formally deemed to be classified.

12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paracha v. Bush
District of Columbia, 2020
Hatim v. Obama
953 F. Supp. 2d 40 (District of Columbia, 2013)
In Re GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE CONTINUED ACCESS TO COUNSEL
892 F. Supp. 2d 8 (District of Columbia, 2012)
In Re Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation
577 F. Supp. 2d 143 (District of Columbia, 2010)
Doe v. Gonzales
500 F. Supp. 2d 379 (S.D. New York, 2007)
Tarkel v. at & T Corp.
441 F. Supp. 2d 899 (N.D. Illinois, 2006)
Adem v. Bush
425 F. Supp. 2d 7 (District of Columbia, 2006)
Al Odah v. United States
406 F. Supp. 2d 37 (District of Columbia, 2005)
In Re Guantanamo Detainee Cases
355 F. Supp. 2d 443 (District of Columbia, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
344 F. Supp. 2d 174, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22525, 2004 WL 2525136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-guantanamo-detainee-cases-dcd-2004.