In Re Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation

577 F. Supp. 2d 143, 2008 WL 4181249
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided May 25, 2010·No. Misc. No. 08-0442 (TFH). Civil Action Nos. 02-cv-0828, 04-cv-1136, 04-cv-1164, 04-cv-1194, 04-cv-1254, 04-cv-1937, 04-cv-2022, 04-cv-2035, 04-cv-2046, 04-cv-2215, 05-cv-0023, 05-cv-0247, 05-cv-0270, 05-cv-0280, 05-cv-0329, 05-cv-0359, 05-cv-0392, 05-cv-0492, 05-cv-0520, 05-cv-0526, 05-cv-0569, 05-cv-0634, 05-cv-0748, 05-cv-0763, 05-cv-0764, 05-cv-0877, 05-cv-0883, 05-cv-0889, 05-cv-0892, 05-cv-0993, 05-cv-0994, 05-cv-0998, 05-cv-0999, 05-cv-1048, 05-cv-1189, 05-cv-1220, 05-cv-1244, 05-cv-1347, 05-cv-1353, 05-cv-1429, 05-cv-1457, 05-cv-1458, 05-cv-1487, 05-cv-1490, 05-cv-1497, 05-cv-1504, 05-cv-1505, 05-cv-1506, 05-cv-1509, 05-cv-1555, 05-cv-1592, 05-cv-1601, 05-cv-1602, 05-cv-1607, 05-cv-1623, 05-cv-1638, 05-cv-1639, 05-cv-1645, 05-cv-1646, 05-cv-1678, 05-cv-1704, 05-cv-1971, 05-cv-1983, 05-cv-2010, 05-cv-2088, 05-cv-2104, 05-cv-2185, 05-cv-2186, 05-cv-2199, 05-cv-2249, 05-cv-2349, 05-cv-2367, 05-cv-2370, 05-cv-2371, 05-cv-2378, 05-cv-2379, 05-cv-2380, 05-cv-2381, 05-cv-2384, 05-cv-2385, 05-cv-2386, 05-cv-2387, 05-cv-2398, 05-cv-2444, 05-cv-2479, 06-cv-0618, 06-cv-1668, 06-cv-1684, 06-cv-1758, 06-cv-1759, 06-cv-1761, 06-cv-1765, 06-cv-1766, 06-cv-1767, 07-cv-1710, 07-cv-2337, 07-cv-2338, 08-cv-0987, 08-cv-1101, 08-cv-1104, 08-cv-1153, 08-cv-1185, 08-cv-1221, 08-cv-1223, 08-cv-1224, 08-cv-1227, 08-cv-1228, 08-cv-1229, 08-cv-1230, 08-cv-1231, 08-cv-1232, 08-cv-1233, 08-cv-1235, 08-cv-1236, 08-cv-1237, 08-cv-1238, 08-cv-1310, 08-cv-1440·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

*145 PROTECTIVE ORDER AND PROCEDURES FOR COUNSEL ACCESS TO DETAINEES AT THE UNITED STATES NAVAL BASE IN GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA

THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.

Upon consideration of the parties’ positions espoused at the status conference held on July 8, 2008, the parties’ submissions, and the record in these coordinated matters, the Court finds that the above-captioned cases involve national security information or documents, the storage, handling, and control of which require special security precautions and access to which requires a security clearance and a “need to know.” These cases might also involve other protected information or documents, the storage, handling, and control of which might require special precautions in order to protect the security of the United States and other significant interests. Accordingly, to protect the national security, and for good cause shown, the Court

ORDERS that, in place of the Amended Protective Order and Procedures for Counsel Access to Detainees at the United States Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, first issued on November 8, 2004, 344 F.Supp.2d 174 (D.D.C.2004), as supplemented by the Order Addressing Designation Procedures for Protected Information, first issued on November 10, 2004, and the Order Supplementing and Amending Filing Procedures Contained in the November 8, 2004, Amended Protective Order, first issued on December 13, 2004, the following Protective Order and Procedures for Counsel Access to Detainees at the United States Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, apply in these coordinated matters:

I.PROTECTIVE ORDER

A. Overview and Applicability
1. This Protective Order establishes procedures that must be followed by petitioners and their respective counsel, all other counsel involved in these matters, interpreters/translators for the parties, personnel or support staff employed or engaged to assist in these matters, and all other individuals who, in connection with these matters, receive access to classified national security information or documents or other protected information, including the privilege team as defined in the Procedures for Counsel Access to Detainees at the United States Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (“Procedures for Counsel Access”), see infra Section II. B. 6.
2. The procedures set forth in this Protective Order apply to all aspects of these matters and may be modified by further order of the Court upon its own motion or upon application by any party. The Court retains continuing jurisdiction to enforce or modify the terms of this Protective Order.
3. Nothing in this Protective Order precludes the government’s use of classified information as otherwise authorized by law outside of these matters.
4. As appropriate and needed, petitioners’ counsel is responsible for advising their employees, petitioners, and others of this Protective Order’s contents.
5. Petitioners’ counsel are bound by the terms and conditions set forth in *146 the Procedures For Counsel Access, see infra Section II. To the extent such terms and conditions place limitations on petitioners’ counsel in their access to and interaction with petitioners or handling of information, this Protective Order specifically incorporates by reference all terms and conditions established in the procedures contained in the Procedures for Counsel Access. Any violation of those terms and conditions will also be deemed a violation of this Protective Order.
6. The privilege team shall not disclose to any person any information provided by petitioners’ counsel or petitioners, other than information provided in a filing with the Court, unless such information, if it were monitored information, could be disclosed under the Procedures for Counsel Access. Any such disclosure shall be consistent with the provisions of the Procedures for Counsel Access.
B. Definitions
7. As used in this Protective Order, the words “documents” and “information” include, but are not limited to, all written or printed matter of any kind, formal or informal, including originals, conforming copies and non-conforming copies, whether different from the original by reason of notation made on such copies or otherwise, and further include, but are not limited to:
a.papers, correspondence, memo-randa, notes, letters, reports, summaries, photographs, maps, charts, graphs, interoffice and in-tra-office communications, notations of any sort concerning conversations, meetings, or other communications, bulletins, teletypes, telegrams, facsimiles, invoices, worksheets, and drafts, alterations, modifications, changes, and amendments of any kind to the foregoing;
b. graphic or oral records or representations of any kind, including, but not limited to, photographs, charts, graphs, microfiche, microfilm, videotapes, sound recordings of any kind, and motion pictures;
c. electronic, mechanical or electric records of any kind, including, but not limited to, tapes, cassettes, disks, recordings, electronic mail, films, typewriter ribbons, word processing or other computer tapes or disks, and all manner of electronic data processing storage; and
d. information acquired orally.
8.The terms “classified national security information and/or documents,” “classified information” and “classified documents” mean:
a. any classified document or information that was classified by any Executive Branch agency in the interests of national security or pursuant to Executive Order, including Executive Order 12958, as amended, or its predecessor Orders, as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “SECRET,” or “TOP SECRET,” or additionally controlled as “SENSITIVE COMPARTMENT-ED INFORMATION (SCI),” or any classified information contained in such document;
b. any document or information, regardless of its physical form or characteristics, now or formerly in the possession of a private party that was derived from United States government information that was classified, regardless of whether such document or inf or- *147 mation has subsequently been classified by the government pursuant to Executive Order, including Executive Order 12958, as amended, or its predecessor Orders, as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “SECRET,” or “TOP SECRET,” or additionally controlled as “SENSITIVE COMPARTMENT-ED INFORMATION (SCI)”;
c. verbal or non-documentary classified information known to petitioners or petitioners’ counsel; or
d. any document and information as to which petitioners or petitioners’ counsel were notified orally or in writing that such document or information contains classified information.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation, 577 F. Supp. 2d 143, 2008 WL 4181249 (D.D.C. 2010).

577 F. Supp. 2d 143 (In Re Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jihad Dhiab v. Donald J. Trump
852 F.3d 1087 (D.C. Circuit, 2017)
Fadhel Hentif v. Barack Obama
733 F.3d 1243 (D.C. Circuit, 2013)
Hatim v. Obama
968 F. Supp. 2d 222 (District of Columbia, 2013)
Barre v. Obama
932 F. Supp. 2d 5 (District of Columbia, 2013)
In Re GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE CONTINUED ACCESS TO COUNSEL
892 F. Supp. 2d 8 (District of Columbia, 2012)
Paracha v. Bush
District of Columbia, 2011
Ameziane v. Obama
620 F.3d 1 (D.C. Circuit, 2010)
BACHA v. Obama
653 F. Supp. 2d 32 (District of Columbia, 2009)