In Re Gross

41 A.3d 736, 210 N.J. 115, 2012 WL 1535849, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 505
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 2, 2012·No. D-87 September Term 2011 070354·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11-324, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(1) (default by respondent), that NEIL L. GROSS of FLANDERS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that NEIL L. GROSS is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Gross, 41 A.3d 736, 210 N.J. 115, 2012 WL 1535849, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 505 (N.J. 2012).

41 A.3d 736 (In Re Gross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kaltner
41 A.3d 736 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2012)