in Re: Gregory Mark Levitz

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 14, 2013·No. 08-13-00188-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: GREGORY MARK LEVITZ, § No. 08-13-00188-CR Relator. § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING § IN MANDAMUS §

§

§

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Gregory M. Levitz, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in which he

asks this Court to order the 70th District Court of Ector County to render a ruling on his motion to

dismiss the judgment to re-pay the court appointed attorney’s fees.

We have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district or county court judge in

our district and against a district court judge acting as a magistrate in a court of inquiry in our

district. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b) (West 2004). However, because Ector County is

not within the Eighth Court of Appeals district, we are without jurisdiction to consider Relator’s

petition. See id. at § 22.201(i), (l); In re Davis, 87 S.W.3d 794, 795 (Tex. App. – Texarkana 2002,

orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we dismiss Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice August 14, 2013

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Gregory Mark Levitz, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re: Gregory Mark Levitz (in Re: Gregory Mark Levitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Don R. DAVIS and Linda L. Davis
87 S.W.3d 794 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)