in Re: Gregory Mark Levitz
This text of in Re: Gregory Mark Levitz (in Re: Gregory Mark Levitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
IN RE: GREGORY MARK LEVITZ, § No. 08-13-00188-CR Relator. § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING § IN MANDAMUS §
§
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Gregory M. Levitz, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in which he
asks this Court to order the 70th District Court of Ector County to render a ruling on his motion to
dismiss the judgment to re-pay the court appointed attorney’s fees.
We have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district or county court judge in
our district and against a district court judge acting as a magistrate in a court of inquiry in our
district. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b) (West 2004). However, because Ector County is
not within the Eighth Court of Appeals district, we are without jurisdiction to consider Relator’s
petition. See id. at § 22.201(i), (l); In re Davis, 87 S.W.3d 794, 795 (Tex. App. – Texarkana 2002,
orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we dismiss Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.
GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice August 14, 2013
Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Gregory Mark Levitz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gregory-mark-levitz-texapp-2013.