In Re Green

176 S.E.2d 19, 9 N.C. App. 326, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1350
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedAugust 26, 1970
Docket709SC349
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 176 S.E.2d 19 (In Re Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Green, 176 S.E.2d 19, 9 N.C. App. 326, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1350 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

Parker, J.

Commissions of an administrator of the estate of a decedent are to be fixed in the discretion of the clerk of superior court subject to the maximum provided by statute. G.S. 28-170. This requires exercise of judicial discretion and judgment by the clerk, who has original jurisdiction in the matter. Trust Co. v. Waddell, 237 N.C. 342, 75 S.E. 2d 151. In other matters relating to the administration of decedents’ estates the clerk also exercises jurisdiction as ex officio judge of probate according to the practice and procedure provided by law. G.S. 7A-241; G.S. 2-1. Under these statutes the petition in the present case for allowance of commissions and attorneys’ fees was initially properly brought before the clerk of superior court.

After hearing testimony of witnesses and examining the official records in his office, the clerk entered his order making findings of fact upon which he based his conclusions of law and judgment. The respondent took no exception to any specific finding of fact made by the clerk but took only a general exception to the judgment entered by the clerk. On appeal to the judge of superior court, respondent’s general exception to the clerk’s order presented only the question whether the facts found support the conclusions of law. In re Estate of Lowther, *329 271 N.C. 345, 156 S.E. 2d 693. The judge of superior court, by entering an order making the same findings of fact and conclusions of law as had been made by the clerk, in effect ruled that the facts found support the conclusions of law. We agree with that ruling. The order appealed from is

Affirmed.

Campbell and Vaughn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Rand
645 S.E.2d 174 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
Matter of Estate of Longest
328 S.E.2d 804 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
In re the Estate of Adamee
221 S.E.2d 370 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 S.E.2d 19, 9 N.C. App. 326, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-green-ncctapp-1970.