In Re: Grand Jury v.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re: Grand Jury v.. Read the opinion of the Court — 705 F.3d 133
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 19, 2012·No. 12-1697·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT July 12, 2012 No. 12-1697

IN RE: GRAND JURY

JOHN DOE1; JOHN DOE 2; ABC CORPORATION, Appellants (E.D. Pa. No. 09-gj-00006)

Present: AMBRO, HARDIMAN, and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges

1. Motion by Appellants’ to Consolidate C.A. Nos.: 12-1697 & 12-2878;

2. Response by Appellee to Appellants’ Motion to Consolidate Appeal;

3. Amended Motion by Appellants to Consolidate C.A. Nos.:12-1697 & 12-2878;

4. Reply by Appellant In Support of Motion to Consolidate.

Respectfully, Clerk/tmk _______________________________ O R D E R ______________________________

The foregoing Motion by Appellants’ to Consolidate C.A. Nos.: 12-1697 & 12- 2878 is hereby granted. In doing so, we also grant Appellants’ Petition for Panel Rehearing in C.A. No. 12-1697. The parties are directed to file briefs addressing the issues raised in the consolidated cases including this Court’s jurisdiction in No. 12-2878 according to the following schedule:

Appellants’ brief shall be filed by 4 P.M. Wednesday, August 15, 2012.

Appellee’s brief shall be filed by 4 P.M. Wednesday, September 5, 2012.

Appellants’ reply brief shall be filed by 4.P.M. Monday, September 17, 2012.

Oral argument will be set at the convenience of the Court.

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro Circuit Judge Dated: July 19, 2012 tmk/cc: Frank P. Cihlar, Esq. Gregory V. Davis, Esq. S. Robert Lyons, Esq. Alexander P. Robbins, Esq. Stephen R. LaCheen, Esq. Ian M. Comisky, Esq. Matthew D. Lee, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Grand Jury v., (3d Cir. 2012).

In Re: Grand Jury v. (In Re: Grand Jury v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.