In Re: Grand Jury v.
This text of In Re: Grand Jury v. (In Re: Grand Jury v.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT July 12, 2012 No. 12-1697
IN RE: GRAND JURY
JOHN DOE1; JOHN DOE 2; ABC CORPORATION, Appellants (E.D. Pa. No. 09-gj-00006)
Present: AMBRO, HARDIMAN, and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges
1. Motion by Appellants’ to Consolidate C.A. Nos.: 12-1697 & 12-2878;
2. Response by Appellee to Appellants’ Motion to Consolidate Appeal;
3. Amended Motion by Appellants to Consolidate C.A. Nos.:12-1697 & 12-2878;
4. Reply by Appellant In Support of Motion to Consolidate.
Respectfully, Clerk/tmk _______________________________ O R D E R ______________________________
The foregoing Motion by Appellants’ to Consolidate C.A. Nos.: 12-1697 & 12- 2878 is hereby granted. In doing so, we also grant Appellants’ Petition for Panel Rehearing in C.A. No. 12-1697. The parties are directed to file briefs addressing the issues raised in the consolidated cases including this Court’s jurisdiction in No. 12-2878 according to the following schedule:
Appellants’ brief shall be filed by 4 P.M. Wednesday, August 15, 2012.
Appellee’s brief shall be filed by 4 P.M. Wednesday, September 5, 2012.
Appellants’ reply brief shall be filed by 4.P.M. Monday, September 17, 2012.
Oral argument will be set at the convenience of the Court.
By the Court,
/s/ Thomas L. Ambro Circuit Judge Dated: July 19, 2012 tmk/cc: Frank P. Cihlar, Esq. Gregory V. Davis, Esq. S. Robert Lyons, Esq. Alexander P. Robbins, Esq. Stephen R. LaCheen, Esq. Ian M. Comisky, Esq. Matthew D. Lee, Esq.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Grand Jury v., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-grand-jury-v-ca3-2012.