In re Grand Jury

667 N.E.2d 363, 76 Ohio St. 3d 236
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 7, 1996·No. No. 95-1334·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Cook, J.

In this case, we revisit the issue of final appealable orders and, in so doing, affirm the court of appeals. In Polikoff v. Adam (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 100, 616 N.E.2d 213, at syllabus, we stated, “Orders that are entered in actions that were recognized at common law or in equity and were not specially created by [238]*238statute are not orders entered in special proceedings pursuant to R.C. 2505.02.” Grand jury proceedings, having existed at common law, are not “special proceedings,” notwithstanding the fact that they have been codified. See State ex rel Doerfler v. Price (1920), 101 Ohio St. 50, 54, 128 N.E. 173, 175; R.C. 2941.02 et seq.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Grand Jury, 667 N.E.2d 363, 76 Ohio St. 3d 236 (Ohio 1996).

667 N.E.2d 363 (In re Grand Jury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Grand Jury Proceeding of John Doe
2016 Ohio 8001 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)
State v. Spencer
710 N.E.2d 352 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1998)
In re Grand Jury
1996 Ohio 399 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)